首页> 外文OA文献 >Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the fixed-dose dual bronchodilator combination tiotropium–olodaterol for patients with COPD in the Netherlands
【2h】

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the fixed-dose dual bronchodilator combination tiotropium–olodaterol for patients with COPD in the Netherlands

机译:固定剂量双支气管扩张剂联合噻托铵-奥洛他特罗对荷兰COPD患者的成本效益和预算影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE: The fixed-dose dual bronchodilator combination (FDC) of tiotropium and olodaterol showed increased effectiveness regarding lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with the use of its mono-components. Yet, while effectiveness and safety have been shown, the health economic implication of this treatment is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-utility and budget impact of tiotropium-olodaterol FDC in patients with moderate to very severe COPD in the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cost-utility study was performed, using an individual-level Markov model. To populate the model, individual patient-level data (age, height, sex, COPD duration, baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second) were obtained from the tiotropium-olodaterol TOnado trial. In the model, forced expiratory volume in 1 second and patient-level data were extrapolated to utility and survival, and treatment with tiotropium-olodaterol FDC was compared with tiotropium. Cost-utility analysis was performed from the Dutch health care payer's perspective using a 15-year time horizon in the base-case analysis. The standard Dutch discount rates were applied (costs: 4.0%; effects: 1.5%). Both univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Budget impact was annually assessed over a 5-year time horizon, taking into account different levels of medication adherence. RESULTS: As a result of cost increases, combined with quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains, results showed that tiotropium-olodaterol FDC had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €7,004/QALY. Without discounting, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €5,981/QALY. Results were robust in univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Budget impact was estimated at €4.3 million over 5 years assuming 100% medication adherence. Scenarios with 40%, 60%, and 80% adherence resulted in lower 5-year incremental cost increases of €1.7, €2.6, and €3.4 million, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tiotropium-olodaterol FDC can be considered a cost-effective treatment under current Dutch cost-effectiveness thresholds.
机译:目的:噻托溴铵和奥洛他罗的固定剂量双支气管扩张剂联合用药(FDC)与单组分使用相比,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中在肺功能和健康相关生活质量方面显示出更高的有效性。然而,尽管已经显示出有效性和安全性,但是这种治疗方法的健康经济意义仍然未知。这项研究的目的是评估荷兰噻托溴铵-奥洛他特罗FDC对中度至重度COPD患者的成本效用和预算影响。患者与方法:使用个体水平的马尔可夫模型进行了成本-效用研究。为了填充模型,从噻托溴铵-奥洛他特罗TOnado试验获得了个体患者水平的数据(年龄,身高,性别,COPD持续时间,基线强迫呼气量(1秒))。在该模型中,将1秒内的强制呼气量和患者水平的数据外推至实用性和生存率,并将噻托溴铵-奥洛特罗FDC与噻托溴铵的治疗进行比较。成本-效用分析是从荷兰医疗保健支付者的角度进行的,在基本案例分析中使用了15年的时间范围。采用荷兰标准折扣率(成本:4.0%;影响:1.5%)。进行了单变量和概率敏感性分析。在5年的时间范围内,每年评估预算影响,并考虑药物依从性的不同水平。结果:由于成本增加,再加上质量调整生命年(QALY),结果表明噻托溴铵-奥洛特罗FDC的成本效益比增加了7,004欧元/ QALY。不计折扣,增量成本效益比为5,981欧元/ QALY。结果在单变量和概率敏感性分析中很可靠。假设100%坚持用药,五年内的预算影响估计为430万欧元。遵循40%,60%和80%的方案,导致5年增量成本增加分别降低了1.7欧元,2.6欧元和340万欧元。结论:在目前的荷兰成本效益阈值下,噻托溴铵-奥罗他多FDC可被认为是一种成本有效的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号